The UK Column is an independent news organisation analysing the information war.
…
continue reading
Evil Of the Adelson's | The Case Against Donna Adelson and Hidden Killers Podcast द्वारा प्रदान की गई सामग्री. एपिसोड, ग्राफिक्स और पॉडकास्ट विवरण सहित सभी पॉडकास्ट सामग्री Evil Of the Adelson's | The Case Against Donna Adelson and Hidden Killers Podcast या उनके पॉडकास्ट प्लेटफ़ॉर्म पार्टनर द्वारा सीधे अपलोड और प्रदान की जाती है। यदि आपको लगता है कि कोई आपकी अनुमति के बिना आपके कॉपीराइट किए गए कार्य का उपयोग कर रहा है, तो आप यहां बताई गई प्रक्रिया का पालन कर सकते हैं https://hi.player.fm/legal।
Player FM - पॉडकास्ट ऐप
Player FM ऐप के साथ ऑफ़लाइन जाएं!
Player FM ऐप के साथ ऑफ़लाइन जाएं!
Conflict of Interest Pauses Jury Selection in Donna Adelson's Murder Trial
MP3•एपिसोड होम
Manage episode 440578413 series 3545960
Evil Of the Adelson's | The Case Against Donna Adelson and Hidden Killers Podcast द्वारा प्रदान की गई सामग्री. एपिसोड, ग्राफिक्स और पॉडकास्ट विवरण सहित सभी पॉडकास्ट सामग्री Evil Of the Adelson's | The Case Against Donna Adelson and Hidden Killers Podcast या उनके पॉडकास्ट प्लेटफ़ॉर्म पार्टनर द्वारा सीधे अपलोड और प्रदान की जाती है। यदि आपको लगता है कि कोई आपकी अनुमति के बिना आपके कॉपीराइट किए गए कार्य का उपयोग कर रहा है, तो आप यहां बताई गई प्रक्रिया का पालन कर सकते हैं https://hi.player.fm/legal।
Jury selection for Donna Adelson's conspiracy and murder trial, which has drawn significant public attention, was halted when potential conflicts of interest involving her defense attorney were raised. The proceedings began with 100 potential jurors summoned to the Leon County Courthouse, but Judge Stephen Everett called for a recess to address these serious legal concerns.
At the heart of the issue is attorney Daniel Rashbaum, who represents both Donna Adelson and her son, Charlie Adelson. Charlie has already been convicted in a related murder-for-hire case and is currently serving a life sentence. His involvement as a state witness in Donna’s trial complicates the defense strategy, as questions arise regarding the potential for biased representation.
On the eve of jury selection, Charlie Adelson’s appellate attorneys filed a notice asserting that he was invoking his Sixth Amendment right to maintain the confidentiality of his prior communications with Rashbaum. They contend that Rashbaum should not be allowed to cross-examine Charlie, and neither should his co-counsel, Alex Morris.
“Mr. Adelson would assert that his privilege, and the conflict of interest, applies to the entire defense team in Mrs. Adelson’s case, and Mr. Adelson should not be subject to cross-examination by any member of the defense team who has been tainted by Mr. Rashbaum’s knowledge and information,” said Charlie's appellate lawyers, Michael Ufferman and Laurel Cornell Niles.
During the recess, Donna Adelson consulted with Adam Komisar, an independent attorney, about her options. Upon returning to court, she expressed her desire to retain Rashbaum and waived any claims regarding potential conflicts of interest. Komisar informed the judge, “She is in a position where she would not like to lose Mr. Rashbaum and is willing to give any waivers.”
However, this waiver raises questions about the effectiveness of Komisar's potential cross-examination of Charlie if he is called as a witness. Komisar acknowledged that while he could not provide the same level of representation as Rashbaum, Donna preferred to move forward without delaying the trial.
Judge Everett posed direct questions to Donna, ensuring she understood the implications of waiving her conflict claims. She affirmed her decision, and the judge stated he would take time to determine if her waiver was "legally sufficient."
The complexities of this case extend beyond mere legal technicalities. Donna Adelson, aged 74, is the fifth defendant to face prosecution in the infamous case surrounding the murder of law professor Dan Markel in 2014. Prosecutors allege that the Adelson family sought to eliminate Markel to enable his ex-wife, Wendi Adelson, to relocate to Miami with their two sons.
Wendi, Donna's daughter, is a key figure in this case, as her ties to both defendants heighten the stakes involved. Alongside Assistant State Attorneys Georgia Cappleman and Sarah Kathryn Dugan, Judge Everett is tasked with navigating these intricate legal waters.
As the courtroom proceedings continued, Alex Morris emphasized to the judge that he had been "walled off" from evidence related to Charlie Adelson’s case. Despite the ongoing complexities, Morris asserted that he was prepared to handle any cross-examination should Charlie testify.
Assistant State Attorney Cappleman noted that while Charlie may not be called as a primary witness, the situation remains fluid and could change. Judge Everett reinforced the importance of effective representation, stating, “Your client has a right to effective representation at every single critical stage.”
With about 900 potential jurors summoned for the trial, the upcoming days are critical in shaping the proceedings as Donna Adelson's fate hangs in the balance.
Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
At the heart of the issue is attorney Daniel Rashbaum, who represents both Donna Adelson and her son, Charlie Adelson. Charlie has already been convicted in a related murder-for-hire case and is currently serving a life sentence. His involvement as a state witness in Donna’s trial complicates the defense strategy, as questions arise regarding the potential for biased representation.
On the eve of jury selection, Charlie Adelson’s appellate attorneys filed a notice asserting that he was invoking his Sixth Amendment right to maintain the confidentiality of his prior communications with Rashbaum. They contend that Rashbaum should not be allowed to cross-examine Charlie, and neither should his co-counsel, Alex Morris.
“Mr. Adelson would assert that his privilege, and the conflict of interest, applies to the entire defense team in Mrs. Adelson’s case, and Mr. Adelson should not be subject to cross-examination by any member of the defense team who has been tainted by Mr. Rashbaum’s knowledge and information,” said Charlie's appellate lawyers, Michael Ufferman and Laurel Cornell Niles.
During the recess, Donna Adelson consulted with Adam Komisar, an independent attorney, about her options. Upon returning to court, she expressed her desire to retain Rashbaum and waived any claims regarding potential conflicts of interest. Komisar informed the judge, “She is in a position where she would not like to lose Mr. Rashbaum and is willing to give any waivers.”
However, this waiver raises questions about the effectiveness of Komisar's potential cross-examination of Charlie if he is called as a witness. Komisar acknowledged that while he could not provide the same level of representation as Rashbaum, Donna preferred to move forward without delaying the trial.
Judge Everett posed direct questions to Donna, ensuring she understood the implications of waiving her conflict claims. She affirmed her decision, and the judge stated he would take time to determine if her waiver was "legally sufficient."
The complexities of this case extend beyond mere legal technicalities. Donna Adelson, aged 74, is the fifth defendant to face prosecution in the infamous case surrounding the murder of law professor Dan Markel in 2014. Prosecutors allege that the Adelson family sought to eliminate Markel to enable his ex-wife, Wendi Adelson, to relocate to Miami with their two sons.
Wendi, Donna's daughter, is a key figure in this case, as her ties to both defendants heighten the stakes involved. Alongside Assistant State Attorneys Georgia Cappleman and Sarah Kathryn Dugan, Judge Everett is tasked with navigating these intricate legal waters.
As the courtroom proceedings continued, Alex Morris emphasized to the judge that he had been "walled off" from evidence related to Charlie Adelson’s case. Despite the ongoing complexities, Morris asserted that he was prepared to handle any cross-examination should Charlie testify.
Assistant State Attorney Cappleman noted that while Charlie may not be called as a primary witness, the situation remains fluid and could change. Judge Everett reinforced the importance of effective representation, stating, “Your client has a right to effective representation at every single critical stage.”
With about 900 potential jurors summoned for the trial, the upcoming days are critical in shaping the proceedings as Donna Adelson's fate hangs in the balance.
Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
74 एपिसोडस
MP3•एपिसोड होम
Manage episode 440578413 series 3545960
Evil Of the Adelson's | The Case Against Donna Adelson and Hidden Killers Podcast द्वारा प्रदान की गई सामग्री. एपिसोड, ग्राफिक्स और पॉडकास्ट विवरण सहित सभी पॉडकास्ट सामग्री Evil Of the Adelson's | The Case Against Donna Adelson and Hidden Killers Podcast या उनके पॉडकास्ट प्लेटफ़ॉर्म पार्टनर द्वारा सीधे अपलोड और प्रदान की जाती है। यदि आपको लगता है कि कोई आपकी अनुमति के बिना आपके कॉपीराइट किए गए कार्य का उपयोग कर रहा है, तो आप यहां बताई गई प्रक्रिया का पालन कर सकते हैं https://hi.player.fm/legal।
Jury selection for Donna Adelson's conspiracy and murder trial, which has drawn significant public attention, was halted when potential conflicts of interest involving her defense attorney were raised. The proceedings began with 100 potential jurors summoned to the Leon County Courthouse, but Judge Stephen Everett called for a recess to address these serious legal concerns.
At the heart of the issue is attorney Daniel Rashbaum, who represents both Donna Adelson and her son, Charlie Adelson. Charlie has already been convicted in a related murder-for-hire case and is currently serving a life sentence. His involvement as a state witness in Donna’s trial complicates the defense strategy, as questions arise regarding the potential for biased representation.
On the eve of jury selection, Charlie Adelson’s appellate attorneys filed a notice asserting that he was invoking his Sixth Amendment right to maintain the confidentiality of his prior communications with Rashbaum. They contend that Rashbaum should not be allowed to cross-examine Charlie, and neither should his co-counsel, Alex Morris.
“Mr. Adelson would assert that his privilege, and the conflict of interest, applies to the entire defense team in Mrs. Adelson’s case, and Mr. Adelson should not be subject to cross-examination by any member of the defense team who has been tainted by Mr. Rashbaum’s knowledge and information,” said Charlie's appellate lawyers, Michael Ufferman and Laurel Cornell Niles.
During the recess, Donna Adelson consulted with Adam Komisar, an independent attorney, about her options. Upon returning to court, she expressed her desire to retain Rashbaum and waived any claims regarding potential conflicts of interest. Komisar informed the judge, “She is in a position where she would not like to lose Mr. Rashbaum and is willing to give any waivers.”
However, this waiver raises questions about the effectiveness of Komisar's potential cross-examination of Charlie if he is called as a witness. Komisar acknowledged that while he could not provide the same level of representation as Rashbaum, Donna preferred to move forward without delaying the trial.
Judge Everett posed direct questions to Donna, ensuring she understood the implications of waiving her conflict claims. She affirmed her decision, and the judge stated he would take time to determine if her waiver was "legally sufficient."
The complexities of this case extend beyond mere legal technicalities. Donna Adelson, aged 74, is the fifth defendant to face prosecution in the infamous case surrounding the murder of law professor Dan Markel in 2014. Prosecutors allege that the Adelson family sought to eliminate Markel to enable his ex-wife, Wendi Adelson, to relocate to Miami with their two sons.
Wendi, Donna's daughter, is a key figure in this case, as her ties to both defendants heighten the stakes involved. Alongside Assistant State Attorneys Georgia Cappleman and Sarah Kathryn Dugan, Judge Everett is tasked with navigating these intricate legal waters.
As the courtroom proceedings continued, Alex Morris emphasized to the judge that he had been "walled off" from evidence related to Charlie Adelson’s case. Despite the ongoing complexities, Morris asserted that he was prepared to handle any cross-examination should Charlie testify.
Assistant State Attorney Cappleman noted that while Charlie may not be called as a primary witness, the situation remains fluid and could change. Judge Everett reinforced the importance of effective representation, stating, “Your client has a right to effective representation at every single critical stage.”
With about 900 potential jurors summoned for the trial, the upcoming days are critical in shaping the proceedings as Donna Adelson's fate hangs in the balance.
Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
At the heart of the issue is attorney Daniel Rashbaum, who represents both Donna Adelson and her son, Charlie Adelson. Charlie has already been convicted in a related murder-for-hire case and is currently serving a life sentence. His involvement as a state witness in Donna’s trial complicates the defense strategy, as questions arise regarding the potential for biased representation.
On the eve of jury selection, Charlie Adelson’s appellate attorneys filed a notice asserting that he was invoking his Sixth Amendment right to maintain the confidentiality of his prior communications with Rashbaum. They contend that Rashbaum should not be allowed to cross-examine Charlie, and neither should his co-counsel, Alex Morris.
“Mr. Adelson would assert that his privilege, and the conflict of interest, applies to the entire defense team in Mrs. Adelson’s case, and Mr. Adelson should not be subject to cross-examination by any member of the defense team who has been tainted by Mr. Rashbaum’s knowledge and information,” said Charlie's appellate lawyers, Michael Ufferman and Laurel Cornell Niles.
During the recess, Donna Adelson consulted with Adam Komisar, an independent attorney, about her options. Upon returning to court, she expressed her desire to retain Rashbaum and waived any claims regarding potential conflicts of interest. Komisar informed the judge, “She is in a position where she would not like to lose Mr. Rashbaum and is willing to give any waivers.”
However, this waiver raises questions about the effectiveness of Komisar's potential cross-examination of Charlie if he is called as a witness. Komisar acknowledged that while he could not provide the same level of representation as Rashbaum, Donna preferred to move forward without delaying the trial.
Judge Everett posed direct questions to Donna, ensuring she understood the implications of waiving her conflict claims. She affirmed her decision, and the judge stated he would take time to determine if her waiver was "legally sufficient."
The complexities of this case extend beyond mere legal technicalities. Donna Adelson, aged 74, is the fifth defendant to face prosecution in the infamous case surrounding the murder of law professor Dan Markel in 2014. Prosecutors allege that the Adelson family sought to eliminate Markel to enable his ex-wife, Wendi Adelson, to relocate to Miami with their two sons.
Wendi, Donna's daughter, is a key figure in this case, as her ties to both defendants heighten the stakes involved. Alongside Assistant State Attorneys Georgia Cappleman and Sarah Kathryn Dugan, Judge Everett is tasked with navigating these intricate legal waters.
As the courtroom proceedings continued, Alex Morris emphasized to the judge that he had been "walled off" from evidence related to Charlie Adelson’s case. Despite the ongoing complexities, Morris asserted that he was prepared to handle any cross-examination should Charlie testify.
Assistant State Attorney Cappleman noted that while Charlie may not be called as a primary witness, the situation remains fluid and could change. Judge Everett reinforced the importance of effective representation, stating, “Your client has a right to effective representation at every single critical stage.”
With about 900 potential jurors summoned for the trial, the upcoming days are critical in shaping the proceedings as Donna Adelson's fate hangs in the balance.
Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
74 एपिसोडस
Усі епізоди
×प्लेयर एफएम में आपका स्वागत है!
प्लेयर एफएम वेब को स्कैन कर रहा है उच्च गुणवत्ता वाले पॉडकास्ट आप के आनंद लेंने के लिए अभी। यह सबसे अच्छा पॉडकास्ट एप्प है और यह Android, iPhone और वेब पर काम करता है। उपकरणों में सदस्यता को सिंक करने के लिए साइनअप करें।