Who really killed Michael Jordan’s father? Follow the Truth is a true crime podcast re-investigating the murder of Michael Jordan’s dad, James R. Jordan Sr. and one of the men convicted of his murder. Daniel Green has served nearly three decades in a North Carolina prison maintaining his innocence in the killing. Veteran crime reporter Amanda Lamb questions the evidence, and explores whether this is a case of wrongful conviction.
…
continue reading
The Trial Of Karen Read | Justice For John O'Keefe and True Crime Today द्वारा प्रदान की गई सामग्री. एपिसोड, ग्राफिक्स और पॉडकास्ट विवरण सहित सभी पॉडकास्ट सामग्री The Trial Of Karen Read | Justice For John O'Keefe and True Crime Today या उनके पॉडकास्ट प्लेटफ़ॉर्म पार्टनर द्वारा सीधे अपलोड और प्रदान की जाती है। यदि आपको लगता है कि कोई आपकी अनुमति के बिना आपके कॉपीराइट किए गए कार्य का उपयोग कर रहा है, तो आप यहां बताई गई प्रक्रिया का पालन कर सकते हैं https://hi.player.fm/legal।
Player FM - पॉडकास्ट ऐप
Player FM ऐप के साथ ऑफ़लाइन जाएं!
Player FM ऐप के साथ ऑफ़लाइन जाएं!
Judge Denies Karen Read's Motion to Dismiss Charges in Murder Case
MP3•एपिसोड होम
Manage episode 436284963 series 3569233
The Trial Of Karen Read | Justice For John O'Keefe and True Crime Today द्वारा प्रदान की गई सामग्री. एपिसोड, ग्राफिक्स और पॉडकास्ट विवरण सहित सभी पॉडकास्ट सामग्री The Trial Of Karen Read | Justice For John O'Keefe and True Crime Today या उनके पॉडकास्ट प्लेटफ़ॉर्म पार्टनर द्वारा सीधे अपलोड और प्रदान की जाती है। यदि आपको लगता है कि कोई आपकी अनुमति के बिना आपके कॉपीराइट किए गए कार्य का उपयोग कर रहा है, तो आप यहां बताई गई प्रक्रिया का पालन कर सकते हैं https://hi.player.fm/legal।
Karen Read, accused of the murder of her Boston police officer boyfriend John O’Keefe, faced a setback as the judge overseeing her trial denied her motion to dismiss two significant charges. This decision marks a crucial development in a case that has drawn substantial attention due to the complex legal arguments surrounding the mistrial declared in Read's previous trial.
Defense attorneys for Karen Read had filed a motion earlier this month seeking the dismissal of the second-degree murder charge and the charge of leaving the scene of a deadly accident. Their argument was based on the contention that retrying Read on these charges would violate the constitutional protection against double jeopardy, which prevents an individual from being tried twice for the same crime.
“We have evidence here that the jury acquitted Ms. Read,” defense attorney Marty Weinberg told the court. He emphasized the importance of a judicial determination on whether the jury had indeed reached a not guilty verdict on these charges, arguing that continuing the prosecution would be unjust.
The case revolves around the January 2022 incident in which Read is accused of striking John O’Keefe with her SUV and leaving him in a snowstorm, leading to his death. The two-month trial that followed ended inconclusively when the jury declared they were hopelessly deadlocked after five days of deliberations, prompting the judge to declare a mistrial.
The defense team highlighted that four jurors had indicated the jury unanimously agreed on not guilty verdicts for the second-degree murder charge and the charge of leaving the scene of a deadly accident. They were deadlocked only on the lesser manslaughter charge. According to the defense, retrying Read on the first two charges would be unconstitutional.
However, Judge Beverly Cannone ruled against the motion, stating, “After careful consideration, this Court concludes that because the defendant was not acquitted of any charges and defense counsel consented to the Court’s declaration of a mistrial, double jeopardy is not implicated by retrial of the defendant.” The judge further clarified that an acquittal must be public and in open court as per state law, which did not occur in Read's case.
In a statement following the ruling, the Norfolk District Attorney’s Office expressed its support for the decision. “We believe that the judge’s decision is consistent with almost 200 years of case law,” the statement read. The office confirmed that they are moving forward with the trial, scheduled to begin on January 27.
Judge Cannone also addressed the defense's stance, noting, "Although the Court did not specifically ask defense counsel if they had any objection to the declaration of a mistrial, counsel had multiple opportunities to voice an objection if they in fact had one." She added that the defense’s current arguments contradicted their earlier position during the trial.
The defense team declined to comment on the ruling when contacted by WBZ-TV. Meanwhile, the Norfolk County District Attorney’s office reiterated their commitment to prosecuting the case, underscoring the legal precedent supporting the judge’s decision.
As the case moves toward a retrial, it continues to raise important questions about the legal interpretations of mistrials, jury deliberations, and the constitutional safeguards against double jeopardy. With the next trial date set for January 27, both the defense and prosecution are preparing for what promises to be another closely watched legal battle.
Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
Defense attorneys for Karen Read had filed a motion earlier this month seeking the dismissal of the second-degree murder charge and the charge of leaving the scene of a deadly accident. Their argument was based on the contention that retrying Read on these charges would violate the constitutional protection against double jeopardy, which prevents an individual from being tried twice for the same crime.
“We have evidence here that the jury acquitted Ms. Read,” defense attorney Marty Weinberg told the court. He emphasized the importance of a judicial determination on whether the jury had indeed reached a not guilty verdict on these charges, arguing that continuing the prosecution would be unjust.
The case revolves around the January 2022 incident in which Read is accused of striking John O’Keefe with her SUV and leaving him in a snowstorm, leading to his death. The two-month trial that followed ended inconclusively when the jury declared they were hopelessly deadlocked after five days of deliberations, prompting the judge to declare a mistrial.
The defense team highlighted that four jurors had indicated the jury unanimously agreed on not guilty verdicts for the second-degree murder charge and the charge of leaving the scene of a deadly accident. They were deadlocked only on the lesser manslaughter charge. According to the defense, retrying Read on the first two charges would be unconstitutional.
However, Judge Beverly Cannone ruled against the motion, stating, “After careful consideration, this Court concludes that because the defendant was not acquitted of any charges and defense counsel consented to the Court’s declaration of a mistrial, double jeopardy is not implicated by retrial of the defendant.” The judge further clarified that an acquittal must be public and in open court as per state law, which did not occur in Read's case.
In a statement following the ruling, the Norfolk District Attorney’s Office expressed its support for the decision. “We believe that the judge’s decision is consistent with almost 200 years of case law,” the statement read. The office confirmed that they are moving forward with the trial, scheduled to begin on January 27.
Judge Cannone also addressed the defense's stance, noting, "Although the Court did not specifically ask defense counsel if they had any objection to the declaration of a mistrial, counsel had multiple opportunities to voice an objection if they in fact had one." She added that the defense’s current arguments contradicted their earlier position during the trial.
The defense team declined to comment on the ruling when contacted by WBZ-TV. Meanwhile, the Norfolk County District Attorney’s office reiterated their commitment to prosecuting the case, underscoring the legal precedent supporting the judge’s decision.
As the case moves toward a retrial, it continues to raise important questions about the legal interpretations of mistrials, jury deliberations, and the constitutional safeguards against double jeopardy. With the next trial date set for January 27, both the defense and prosecution are preparing for what promises to be another closely watched legal battle.
Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
446 एपिसोडस
MP3•एपिसोड होम
Manage episode 436284963 series 3569233
The Trial Of Karen Read | Justice For John O'Keefe and True Crime Today द्वारा प्रदान की गई सामग्री. एपिसोड, ग्राफिक्स और पॉडकास्ट विवरण सहित सभी पॉडकास्ट सामग्री The Trial Of Karen Read | Justice For John O'Keefe and True Crime Today या उनके पॉडकास्ट प्लेटफ़ॉर्म पार्टनर द्वारा सीधे अपलोड और प्रदान की जाती है। यदि आपको लगता है कि कोई आपकी अनुमति के बिना आपके कॉपीराइट किए गए कार्य का उपयोग कर रहा है, तो आप यहां बताई गई प्रक्रिया का पालन कर सकते हैं https://hi.player.fm/legal।
Karen Read, accused of the murder of her Boston police officer boyfriend John O’Keefe, faced a setback as the judge overseeing her trial denied her motion to dismiss two significant charges. This decision marks a crucial development in a case that has drawn substantial attention due to the complex legal arguments surrounding the mistrial declared in Read's previous trial.
Defense attorneys for Karen Read had filed a motion earlier this month seeking the dismissal of the second-degree murder charge and the charge of leaving the scene of a deadly accident. Their argument was based on the contention that retrying Read on these charges would violate the constitutional protection against double jeopardy, which prevents an individual from being tried twice for the same crime.
“We have evidence here that the jury acquitted Ms. Read,” defense attorney Marty Weinberg told the court. He emphasized the importance of a judicial determination on whether the jury had indeed reached a not guilty verdict on these charges, arguing that continuing the prosecution would be unjust.
The case revolves around the January 2022 incident in which Read is accused of striking John O’Keefe with her SUV and leaving him in a snowstorm, leading to his death. The two-month trial that followed ended inconclusively when the jury declared they were hopelessly deadlocked after five days of deliberations, prompting the judge to declare a mistrial.
The defense team highlighted that four jurors had indicated the jury unanimously agreed on not guilty verdicts for the second-degree murder charge and the charge of leaving the scene of a deadly accident. They were deadlocked only on the lesser manslaughter charge. According to the defense, retrying Read on the first two charges would be unconstitutional.
However, Judge Beverly Cannone ruled against the motion, stating, “After careful consideration, this Court concludes that because the defendant was not acquitted of any charges and defense counsel consented to the Court’s declaration of a mistrial, double jeopardy is not implicated by retrial of the defendant.” The judge further clarified that an acquittal must be public and in open court as per state law, which did not occur in Read's case.
In a statement following the ruling, the Norfolk District Attorney’s Office expressed its support for the decision. “We believe that the judge’s decision is consistent with almost 200 years of case law,” the statement read. The office confirmed that they are moving forward with the trial, scheduled to begin on January 27.
Judge Cannone also addressed the defense's stance, noting, "Although the Court did not specifically ask defense counsel if they had any objection to the declaration of a mistrial, counsel had multiple opportunities to voice an objection if they in fact had one." She added that the defense’s current arguments contradicted their earlier position during the trial.
The defense team declined to comment on the ruling when contacted by WBZ-TV. Meanwhile, the Norfolk County District Attorney’s office reiterated their commitment to prosecuting the case, underscoring the legal precedent supporting the judge’s decision.
As the case moves toward a retrial, it continues to raise important questions about the legal interpretations of mistrials, jury deliberations, and the constitutional safeguards against double jeopardy. With the next trial date set for January 27, both the defense and prosecution are preparing for what promises to be another closely watched legal battle.
Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
Defense attorneys for Karen Read had filed a motion earlier this month seeking the dismissal of the second-degree murder charge and the charge of leaving the scene of a deadly accident. Their argument was based on the contention that retrying Read on these charges would violate the constitutional protection against double jeopardy, which prevents an individual from being tried twice for the same crime.
“We have evidence here that the jury acquitted Ms. Read,” defense attorney Marty Weinberg told the court. He emphasized the importance of a judicial determination on whether the jury had indeed reached a not guilty verdict on these charges, arguing that continuing the prosecution would be unjust.
The case revolves around the January 2022 incident in which Read is accused of striking John O’Keefe with her SUV and leaving him in a snowstorm, leading to his death. The two-month trial that followed ended inconclusively when the jury declared they were hopelessly deadlocked after five days of deliberations, prompting the judge to declare a mistrial.
The defense team highlighted that four jurors had indicated the jury unanimously agreed on not guilty verdicts for the second-degree murder charge and the charge of leaving the scene of a deadly accident. They were deadlocked only on the lesser manslaughter charge. According to the defense, retrying Read on the first two charges would be unconstitutional.
However, Judge Beverly Cannone ruled against the motion, stating, “After careful consideration, this Court concludes that because the defendant was not acquitted of any charges and defense counsel consented to the Court’s declaration of a mistrial, double jeopardy is not implicated by retrial of the defendant.” The judge further clarified that an acquittal must be public and in open court as per state law, which did not occur in Read's case.
In a statement following the ruling, the Norfolk District Attorney’s Office expressed its support for the decision. “We believe that the judge’s decision is consistent with almost 200 years of case law,” the statement read. The office confirmed that they are moving forward with the trial, scheduled to begin on January 27.
Judge Cannone also addressed the defense's stance, noting, "Although the Court did not specifically ask defense counsel if they had any objection to the declaration of a mistrial, counsel had multiple opportunities to voice an objection if they in fact had one." She added that the defense’s current arguments contradicted their earlier position during the trial.
The defense team declined to comment on the ruling when contacted by WBZ-TV. Meanwhile, the Norfolk County District Attorney’s office reiterated their commitment to prosecuting the case, underscoring the legal precedent supporting the judge’s decision.
As the case moves toward a retrial, it continues to raise important questions about the legal interpretations of mistrials, jury deliberations, and the constitutional safeguards against double jeopardy. With the next trial date set for January 27, both the defense and prosecution are preparing for what promises to be another closely watched legal battle.
Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
446 एपिसोडस
すべてのエピソード
×प्लेयर एफएम में आपका स्वागत है!
प्लेयर एफएम वेब को स्कैन कर रहा है उच्च गुणवत्ता वाले पॉडकास्ट आप के आनंद लेंने के लिए अभी। यह सबसे अच्छा पॉडकास्ट एप्प है और यह Android, iPhone और वेब पर काम करता है। उपकरणों में सदस्यता को सिंक करने के लिए साइनअप करें।