The California Appellate Law podcast

#Business #Tim Kowal & Jeff Lewis #Jeff Lewis #Tim Kowal #Law #Attorney #California #Supreme Court #Legal #Legal News #Appellate #Podcasting Education #News #Appeal #Lawyers

26:18

How do you know when it’s time to make your next big career move? With International Women’s Day around the corner, we are excited to feature Avni Patel Thompson, Founder and CEO of Milo. Avni is building technology that directly supports the often overlooked emotional and logistical labor that falls on parents—especially women. Milo is an AI assistant designed to help families manage that invisible load more efficiently. In this episode, Avni shares her journey from studying chemistry to holding leadership roles at global brands like Adidas and Starbucks, to launching her own ventures. She discusses how she approaches career transitions, the importance of unpleasant experiences, and why she’s focused on making everyday life easier for parents. [01:26] Avni's University Days and Early Career [04:36] Non-Linear Career Paths [05:16] Pursuing Steep Learning Curves [11:51] Entrepreneurship and Safety Nets [15:22] Lived Experiences and Milo [19:55] Avni’s In Her Ellement Moment [20:03] Reflections Links: Avni Patel Thompson on LinkedIn Suchi Srinivasan on LinkedIn Kamila Rakhimova on LinkedIn Ipsos report on the future of parenting About In Her Ellement: In Her Ellement highlights the women and allies leading the charge in digital, business, and technology innovation. Through engaging conversations, the podcast explores their journeys—celebrating successes and acknowledging the balance between work and family. Most importantly, it asks: when was the moment you realized you hadn’t just arrived—you were truly in your element? About The Hosts: Suchi Srinivasan is an expert in AI and digital transformation. Originally from India, her career includes roles at trailblazing organizations like Bell Labs and Microsoft. In 2011, she co-founded the Cleanweb Hackathon, a global initiative driving IT-powered climate solutions with over 10,000 members across 25+ countries. She also advises Women in Cloud, aiming to create $1B in economic opportunities for women entrepreneurs by 2030. Kamila Rakhimova is a fintech leader whose journey took her from Tajikistan to the U.S., where she built a career on her own terms. Leveraging her English proficiency and international relations expertise, she discovered the power of microfinance and moved to the U.S., eventually leading Amazon's Alexa Fund to support underrepresented founders. Subscribe to In Her Ellement on your podcast app of choice to hear meaningful conversations with women in digital, business, and technology.…

The California Appellate Law Podcast

साझा करें

शृंखला होम•Feed

An appellate law podcast for trial lawyers. Appellate specialists Jeff Lewis and Tim Kowal discuss timely trial tips and the latest cases and news coming from the California Court of Appeal and California Supreme Court.

165 एपिसोडस

The California Appellate Law Podcast

updated a day ago

साझा करें

शृंखला होम•Feed

165 एपिसोडस

#Business #Tim Kowal & Jeff Lewis #Jeff Lewis #Tim Kowal #Law #Attorney #California #Supreme Court #Legal #Legal News #Appellate #Podcasting Education #News #Appeal #Lawyers

Semua episod

The California Appellate Law Podcast

1
Did Trump Violate the Deportation Order? 34:55

1 day ago34:55

34:55

A federal judge ordered the Trump administration not to deport five plaintiffs, alleged MS-13 and Tren de Aragua Venezuelan gang members. The administration complied, but then the judge verbally ordered the administration to turn around a plane and return 261 non-party alleged gang members. The administration didn’t do so, and appealed. Meanwhile, the President tweeted that the judge should be impeached. In response, the Chief Justice said that’s not how we do things. Jeff and Tim react: Is the President’s determination that the deportees are part of an “invasion or predatory incursion” affiliated with a foreign nation a political question, and thus nonjusticiable? If so, can the President just ship off Rachel Maddow without judicial review? Was it irregular for 261 non-party alleged gang members to get added to a TRO after an oral motion and no opportunity for briefing? Was it wise for the court to create a contest between the court and the presidency by verbally demanding planes turn around? Was it wise for the President to tweet in protest against the judge? (To the former: it’s arguable. To the latter: certainly not.) We then discuss how you can lose your right to appellate fees for being uncivil. And if you are uncivil, does the court expect you to apologize? Appellate Specialist Jeff Lewis' biography , LinkedIn profile , and Twitter feed . Appellate Specialist Tim Kowal's biography , LinkedIn profile , Twitter feed , and YouTube page . Sign up for Not To Be Published , Tim Kowal’s weekly legal update, or view his blog of recent cases . Other items discussed in the episode: Videos from this episode will be posted at Tim Kowal’s YouTube channel .…

The California Appellate Law Podcast

1
Audio clips at trial & oral argument tips 19:45

9 days ago19:45

19:45

Even if you technically can’t use an electronic recording to create the appellate record, trial courts do provide them for us in your closing argument PowerPoint. Jeff shares his experience. And after spending most of a morning watching oral arguments waiting for his case, Jeff offers these tips: It took 20 minutes of argument time just for the panel to get its head around who was who in a case full of alphabet-soup entities. If you’re spending a third of oral argument time in front of a confused panel, you’re doing it wrong. Try this: If your case has lots of “ABC LLCs” and “ABC Holdings LLCs,” try using functional names instead—like “the management company,” and “the holding company,” "investor", "bank", "assignee," etc. Anticipate this confusion in your briefs. Include a clear chart in the brief that helps track the parties, preferably directly in the brief or as a supplemental exhibit. The goal is to reduce "friction." If you’ve used up all panel’s brain synapses just to understand the players, you’re going to have a poor time once you get to the merits. We also get to a couple cases, including a trap on appellate briefing extensions. Appellate Specialist Jeff Lewis' biography , LinkedIn profile , and Twitter feed . Appellate Specialist Tim Kowal's biography , LinkedIn profile , Twitter feed , and YouTube page . Sign up for Not To Be Published , Tim Kowal’s weekly legal update, or view his blog of recent cases . Other items discussed in the episode: Are employees immune from paying discovery fees? A stipulated dismissal is appealable, but not a voluntary dismissal?…

The California Appellate Law Podcast

1
Beware using the Judicial Council form dismissal 11:22

16 days ago11:22

11:22

Here’s a trap door to avoid: if you are trying to expedite an appeal by dismissing remaining claims, do not use the Judicial Council dismissal form. Instead, you need a judge-signed dismissal. While Jeff is still in trial, Tim covers Maniago v. Desert Cardiology Consultants' Medical Group, Inc. (Jan. 30, 2025, No. D085025) 2025 WL 617972. The plaintiff dismissed his remaining claims after his core theory was gutted on demurrer, but the Court of Appeal held that a voluntary dismissal using the Judicial Council form is not an appealable order. If you are an appellate specialist and trial counsel asks how to expedite an appeal after a devastating interlocutory ruling, you’ll need to know about this trap door in Maniago , as well as the right way forward in Tos v. State (2021) 72 Cal.App.5th 184. And if you understand why a voluntary dismissal using the Judicial Council form is not appealable, but a voluntary dismissal using pleading paper is, then please volunteer to come on the podcast to explain it to the rest of us! Appellate Specialist Jeff Lewis' biography , LinkedIn profile , and Twitter feed . Appellate Specialist Tim Kowal's biography , LinkedIn profile , Twitter feed , and YouTube page . Sign up for Not To Be Published , Tim Kowal’s weekly legal update, or view his blog of recent cases . Other items discussed in the episode: Maniago v. Desert Cardiology Consultants' Medical Group, Inc. (Jan. 30, 2025, No. D085025) 2025 WL 617972 Tos v. State (2021) 72 Cal.App.5th 184 Kurwa v. Kislinger (2017) 4 Cal.5th 109 (writeup here )…

The California Appellate Law Podcast

1
Is the electronic-recording ban unconstitutional? 23:15

23 days ago23:15

23:15

All eyes are on the electronic-recording original proceeding in the Supreme Court, Family Violence Appellate Panel v. Superior Court , and the Court’s recent order to show cause why, when a court reporter can’t be found, California’s trial courts should not be ordered to hit the “record” button. This could this be the most significant advancement in electronic court recording in decades. But it raises a few questions: ❔ The remedy sought is limited to low-income litigants. But if the Court buys the equal-protection arguments, won’t it require a holding for all Californians? ❔ Will the Superior Courts oppose the relief? LA Superior Court, after all, already issued a local rule allowing electronic recordings. ❓ Will the Legislature oppose? To the contrary, Jeff makes a bold prediction that the Legislature, to avoid embarrassment, will amend or abolish Gov. Code § 69957 before the Court rules. ⁉️ Will the court reporter lobby oppose? Is opposition possible without appearing villainous? Appellate Specialist Jeff Lewis' biography , LinkedIn profile , and Twitter feed . Appellate Specialist Tim Kowal's biography , LinkedIn profile , Twitter feed , and YouTube page . Sign up for Not To Be Published , Tim Kowal’s weekly legal update, or view his blog of recent cases . Other items discussed in the episode: Is the electronic-recording ban unconstitutional? Family Violence Appellate Project v. Superior Court (no. S288176 ) J ameson v. Desta (2018)…

The California Appellate Law Podcast

1
ChatGPT Fails, Sanctions & Disbarments, Feb. 2025 35:54

4 weeks ago35:54

35:54

Please AI responsibly: Attorneys at a major law firm are making use of ChatGPT. That's not a bad thing normally, but filling in legal cites is not what it's for. The unchecked ChatGPT cases were fake at a rate of 8 out of 9 total cases in a single brief. On this recent legal news episode Jeff and Tim cover: How to AI responsibly (and not get sanctioned). How to challenge arbitration responsibly (and not get sanctioned). How to anti-SLAPP responsibly (and not get sanctioned). Recent court stats and rule updates. Appellate Specialist Jeff Lewis' biography , LinkedIn profile , and Twitter feed . Appellate Specialist Tim Kowal's biography , LinkedIn profile , Twitter feed , and YouTube page . Sign up for Not To Be Published , Tim Kowal’s weekly legal update, or view his blog of recent cases . Other items discussed in the episode: AI Hallucinations May Lead to Sanctions for Big PI Law firm**.** Changes coming to Legal Specialization Board? Plantations at Haywood 1, LLC v. Plantations at Haywood, LLC *Wash v. Banda-Wash - 40 day period to claim costs after appeal not extended by 2 days - we are sent remands, we are not served with remands* Filmore Center Associates v. Lewis; San Francisco Superior Court Disbarred in Federal Court, But Welcome in State Court? Frivolous anti-SLAP…

The California Appellate Law Podcast

1
Is California’s 30-day pay-or-waive arbitration rule preempted by the FAA? The split widens 15:08

5 weeks ago15:08

15:08

Your check for arbitration fees gets delayed in the mail. Under a particularly harsh pay-or-waive provision of the California Arbitration Act, if your fee is received on day 31, too bad—your arbitration rights go Poof! Or do they? There’s currently a big split among the appellate courts on this. Tim goes solo while Jeff is still in trial, covering several of the recent cases on both sides of the split. Does your arb agreement incorporate the FAA? You might be well-poised to argue it preempts the FAA. Or is the arb agreement silent on FAA, or include only a qualified reference? You’re on shakier ground. There’s also a separation of powers concern: Can the legislature declare that late arbitration fee payments automatically equal a waiver of arbitration rights, or is that a judicial function? Waiver is a common-law doctrine, and it’s discretionary. But clearly that’s not how the legislature intends it. And waiver requires fact-finding of the parties’ intentions in a particular case—obviously the Legislature doesn’t know what some future litigant in some future scenario “intends.” Appellate Specialist Jeff Lewis' biography , LinkedIn profile , and Twitter feed . Appellate Specialist Tim Kowal's biography , LinkedIn profile , Twitter feed , and YouTube page . Sign up for Not To Be Published , Tim Kowal’s weekly legal update, or view his blog of recent cases . Other items discussed in the episode: Late payment does not defeat arbitration because that CAA rule is preempted by FAA—but Justice Baker dissents (May 30, 2024) Yet another arbitration preemption case, with 1st Dist. holding CAA’s 30-day deadline survives Another late arbitration payment case, again holding the FAA preempts the CAA Hernandez v. Sohnen Enters. (D2d5 May 22, 2024 No. B323303) [cert. for pub.] (rev. granted in Hohenshelt) Keeton v. Tesla, Inc. (D1d1 Jun. 26, 2024 No. A166690) (mentioned here )…

The California Appellate Law Podcast

1
The court recorded my trial, so why can’t I use it on appeal? 29:54

6 weeks ago29:54

29:54

The San Bernardino Superior Court electronically records trial. Can Jeff use the recording as the appellate record? Short answer: no. But there’s an original writ pending in the Supreme Court on a similar issue, so watch this space. We also cover: Jury Fee Hike, Paid by State Fund—but for how long? Shehi v. Chicago Title Insurance Co. —attorney disqualification is appealable, but expert witness exclusion isn't, even when the expert is an attorney. Tom Girardi saga—Wife Erica Girardi held not liable for aiding and abetting her husband's client trust fund misconduct. The Fifth Amendment & Privilege Logs – A Ninth Circuit case on self-incrimination and privilege log requirements. Appellate Specialist Jeff Lewis' biography , LinkedIn profile , and Twitter feed . Appellate Specialist Tim Kowal's biography , LinkedIn profile , Twitter feed , and YouTube page . Sign up for Not To Be Published , Tim Kowal’s weekly legal update, or view his blog of recent cases . Other items discussed in the episode: Attorney DQ Orders Are Appealable, But Not for Attorney Expert Witnesses Audio recording in San Bernardino and Court Reporters Finn v. Girardi (2D5d. Jan. 28, 2025, No. B324878) (nonpub. opn.). In Re Grand Jury Subpoena (9th Cir., Jan. 28, 2025, No. 24-2506)…

The California Appellate Law Podcast

1
$340k Incivility Tax & Other Cases 11:34

7 weeks ago11:34

11:34

Jeff is in trial, so take in a few quick summaries of recent cases and get back to billing: Incivility cost attorney $340,000 in fee reduction. Clip-n-save the recent controlling case on this point, Karton v. Ari Design & Construction, Inc. : "Excellent lawyers deserve higher fees, and excellent lawyers are civil.” Don’t let the trial court deny relief before you’ve asked for it. Lost the CCP 998 bet? You can still get judgment-enforcement fees. Infamous sterlization case Buck v. Bell (”three generations of imbeciles are enough”) has never been formally overruled, and the California Court of Appeal still gives the mentally disabled mere rational basis. Appellate Specialist Jeff Lewis' biography , LinkedIn profile , and Twitter feed . Appellate Specialist Tim Kowal's biography , LinkedIn profile , Twitter feed , and YouTube page . Sign up for Not To Be Published , Tim Kowal’s weekly legal update, or view his blog of recent cases . Other items discussed in the episode: Court cannot deny fees until a motion is made Headnotes Jan. 24, 2025: one-sentence summaries of this week’s below-the-fold cases Incivility Fee Reduction of $340k! The Court of Appeal says that rational basis review applies to mentally disabled.…

The California Appellate Law Podcast

1
Movie-Trailer Case Reviews 25:22

8 weeks ago25:22

25:22

There was a bit in an old radio show (Kevin-and-Bean KROQ old, not Little Orphan Annie old) had Ralph Garman review movies he’d never seen, based only on watching the trailers. In this episode, we review some cases we haven’t read. We discuss the cases below, which lead to some good tangents. When discovery objections have been waived, does serving responses that still contain the waived objections count as “substantial compliance”? Trial court said no, but the correct answer is Yes, says Katayama v. Cont'l Inv. Grp. (D4d3 Oct. 9, 2024 No. G063872) [published]. Discussing the difference between waiver and forfeiture. N. Am. Title Co. v. The Superior Court. (Cal. Oct. 28, 2024 No. S280752). Satisfying judgment renders appeal moot: In Baker Entm't, LLC v. Emmett Furla Oasis Films, LLC . (2D7d Oct. 28, 2024. No. B323388) (nonpub. opn.) Failing to respond to demand for punitive damages information, defendant forfeited its challenge to $15M punitives award. ( Mosley v. Pacifica Bakersfield, L.P. (D5 Sep. 19, 2024 No. F084699) (nonpub. opn.). To Avoid Unjust Result, Unambiguous Statute Held Ambiguous. In re Marriage of Cady and Gamick (D2d1 Sep. 25, 2024 No. B326716) Other items discussed in the episode: Headnotes 11/21/24: Judge Bias Can Be Forfeited But Not Defective Service Late objections to RFAs do not invalidate otherwise substantive responses Headnotes: one-sentence summaries of this week’s below-the-fold cases…

The California Appellate Law Podcast

1
TikTok at the Supreme Court & Oral Argument Stories 26:23

9 weeks ago26:23

26:23

This is why your teenagers are anxious: TikTok’s fate hangs in the balance at the Supreme Court. We discuss the recent oral arguments, and Donald Trump’s amicus brief asking the Court to sit tight and he’ll make a fantastic deal that will be fantastic and make the Court very happy and everyone will be very happy. (That is the best Trump impression I can do in written form 🤷). And what does it mean when the Court of Appeal decided an appeal based on what one attorney does—and the other attorney doesn’t do—at oral argument? We discuss *Pollock v. Kelso * where the court decides that the plaintiff is the previaling party according to a settlement….a settlement the court has never seen. We also cover Blauser v. Dubin discussing what to do when the trial court does not issue a final appealable order. Appellate Specialist Jeff Lewis' biography , LinkedIn profile , and Twitter feed . Appellate Specialist Tim Kowal's biography , LinkedIn profile , Twitter feed , and YouTube page . Sign up for Not To Be Published , Tim Kowal’s weekly legal update, or view his blog of recent cases . Other items discussed in the episode: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ynzTXuORJwM **Appellate court criticizes trial court practice of failing to enter final appealable orders Blauser v. Dubin ** (4D3d Nov. 19, 2024 No. G063715). **No reporter’s transcript of attorneys’ fees hearing doomed this appeal Saydman v. Aegis Sec. Ins. Co. ** (Cal. Ct. App. Dec. 20, 2024 No. G063209) (nonpub. opn.)…

The California Appellate Law Podcast

1
Roundup of 2024 and What’s Coming in 2025 25:42

10 weeks ago25:42

25:42

Here is our 2024 roundup, and in exchange we have a request for suggestions for 2025 content. If you are an attorney, what content do you prefer? Check out the poll . Now here’s the roundup of updates for 2025: 📅 MSJ Deadlines Are Updated: Remember 81-20-11. With the MSJ hearing as the target, motions must be filed beforehand 81 days, oppositions 20 days, and replies 11 days. 🥈 Making a 2nd attempt at an MSJ? You’ll need leave of court. ⌨️ The court reporter shortage is before the Supreme Court. Stay tuned. Here’s the roundup of notable cases from 2024: Biden admin takes aim at judges issuing sweeping nationwide injunctions. (But Tim asks: then who will take aim at federal authorities exercising sweeping nationwide powers?) Will anti-SLAPPs still be a thing in the Ninth Circuit by the end of 2025? Stay tuned for updates from the en banc panel in Martinez v. ZoomInfo Techs. The appellate courts continued to crack down on attorney incivility, with the court vowing that offending attorneys “will be called out and immortalized in the California Appellate Reports.” Appellate Specialist Jeff Lewis' biography , LinkedIn profile , and Twitter feed . Appellate Specialist Tim Kowal's biography , LinkedIn profile , Twitter feed , and YouTube page . Sign up for Not To Be Published , Tim Kowal’s weekly legal update, or view his blog of recent cases . Other items discussed in the episode: Videos from this episode will be posted at Tim Kowal’s YouTube channel . Amendments to California's Motion for Summary Judgment Statute : Assembly Bill 2049 Text : Official legislative text detailing the changes effective January 1, 2025. Client Alert: New Summary Judgment Law in California Effective January 1, 2025 : An overview of the new law and its implications. New Changes to California's Summary Judgment Process: What You Need to Know : Insights into how the amendments will affect litigation strategies. Court Reporter Shortage and Audio Recording in Courtrooms : California Courts - Newsroom: Updates and news releases from the California judicial branch. Supreme Court Arguments on TikTok's Foreign Ownership and Nationwide Injunctions : SCOTUSblog : Comprehensive coverage of upcoming Supreme Court cases and arguments. Civility in Legal Practice : Masimo Corporation v. The Vanderpool Law Firm Case Summary : Details of the case addressing issues of civility and discovery sanctions. The Uncivil War Raging Before the Cali…

The California Appellate Law Podcast

1
End the Bar Exam? with Jackie Gardina 46:49

13 weeks ago46:49

46:49

Jackie Gardina shares dispatches from the Blue Ribbon Commission on reforming the Bar Exam, covering recent reforms, the ongoing debate about the exam’s effectiveness, and the rise of alternative pathways to legal licensure. Some takeaways: 💯 Yes, the passing score was dropped—but don’t worry, the old one was picked out of a hat (basically). 🗯️“End the bar exam?! But that’s how it’s always been done!” Nope. Before that there were was the “diploma privilege” model, and before that the apprenticeship model. 🔍 What are other states doing? The mentorship model is in use in Oregon, Washington, and Nevada, and the diploma privilege model in Wisconsin. Jackie Gardina biography , LinkedIn profile, and Twitter feed. Appellate Specialist Jeff Lewis' biography , LinkedIn profile , and Twitter feed . Appellate Specialist Tim Kowal's biography , LinkedIn profile , Twitter feed , and YouTube page . Sign up for Not To Be Published , Tim Kowal’s weekly legal update, or view his blog of recent cases . Other items discussed in the episode: NCBE Study Aids Store: Offers various resources, including practice questions and study packs for the Multistate Bar Exam (MBE), Multistate Essay Exam (MEE), and Multistate Performance Test (MPT). Visit their store here: NCBE Study Aids Store NextGen Bar Exam Information : Provides details on the upcoming changes to the bar exam format, including sample questions and a timeline for implementation. Explore more here: NextGen Bar Exam You can find more information about the commission, its objectives, and updates on its activities on the State Bar of California’s website The State Bar of California “To learn more about The Colleges of Law and the work being done visit collegesoflaw.edu/ ”…

The California Appellate Law Podcast

1
How the Cal. Appellate Project Promotes Appellate Experience and Access to Justice 39:51

15 weeks ago39:51

39:51

There is a 700-appellate case backlog in Los Angeles and only around 450 attorneys on the California Appellate Project—Los Angeles panel. CAP-LA attorneys Jennifer Hansen and Jennifer Peabody share how the rest of us can pitch in to assuage this gap in the administration of justice. Why work as a panel attorney? Get appellate experience. Work with an experienced appellate attorney. Flexible schedules, remote work, and mentorship. While rates are modest, they may be increasing. And there are no client-trust concerns, and CAP-LA covers malpractice insurance. Grow your reputation and rapport with colleagues and the bench. Make a meaningful difference in clients' lives. Tune in to hear how appellate attorneys can make a profound impact while building their careers and enhancing their reputations in the legal community. Jennifer Hansen biography , LinkedIn profile, and Twitter feed. Jennifer Peabody biography , LinkedIn profile, and Twitter feed. Appellate Specialist Jeff Lewis' biography , LinkedIn profile , and Twitter feed . Appellate Specialist Tim Kowal's biography , LinkedIn profile , Twitter feed , and YouTube page . Sign up for Not To Be Published , Tim Kowal’s weekly legal update, or view his blog of recent cases . Other items discussed in the episode: Below are links to all five project websites and the application for each. Panel Application Links: First District Appellate Project: https://www.fdap.org/about/applying-to-the-panel/ Sixth District Appellate Project: https://sdap.org/about/panel-application/ Central California Appellate Program: https://capcentral.org/about/how-to-apply/ Appellate Defenders Inc: https://www.adi-sandiego.com/panel-attorneys/how-to-become-a-panel-attorney/ California Appellate Project - LA: https://cap-la.org/apply/ Examples of online resources for appointed attorneys are below: Samples bank: https://capcentral.org/resources/motion/ Practice Guide: https://www.adi-sandiego.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/Manual-4th-Edition-Oct-2024.pdf Appointed Appellate Attorney Community: www.cadc.net…

The California Appellate Law Podcast

1
CALP w/ Chris Dralla, Creator of Typelaw, Revolutionizing Legal Writing 40:01

16 weeks ago40:01

40:01

Attorneys still wrestling with Microsoft Word to finish a brief need to be acquainted with Chris Dralla’s product Typelaw, the groundbreaking tool that lets attorneys turn plain text into fully formatted, cited, hyperlinked, local rule-compliant briefs. If your practice depends on producing high-quality briefs, here is why you need Typelaw in your life: Typelaw reduces non-billable time spent on technical aspects of brief preparation, allowing lawyers to focus on legal arguments. Moving beyond Word, Typelaw lets you edit directly in the PDF to see instantly what the final, hyperlinked version will look. We also compare and contrast Typelaw with similar and complimentary offerings from Clearbrief and CounselPress. Chris Dralla’s biography , LinkedIn profile , and Twitter feed . Appellate Specialist Jeff Lewis' biography , LinkedIn profile , and Twitter feed . Appellate Specialist Tim Kowal's biography , LinkedIn profile , Twitter feed , and YouTube page . Sign up for Not To Be Published , Tim Kowal’s weekly legal update, or view his blog of recent cases . Other items discussed in the episode: Videos from this episode will be posted at Tim Kowal’s YouTube channel . Explore Type Law : Visit Type Law's website to learn more about their services for automating appellate and trial brief preparation.…

The California Appellate Law Podcast

1
Reaction to Judge Jones and Prof. Vladeck's Exchange on Judge Shopping 16:34

17 weeks ago16:34